Legal Opinion
Schwieterman v. Schwieterman
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided May 25, 2012No. 5D11-143PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCohen, J.
Lissette C. Schwieterman appeals certain findings and rulings the trial court made in a final judgment of dissolution. We affirm in part and reverse in part.
The parties married in 2007 and had a child in December 2008. The final judgment’s provisions relating to the child form the bulk of the dispute. Critical to the resolution of this case is the determination of the standard of review. Former wife contends the trial court erred in the application of law and thus review is de novo. See Wade v. Hirschman, 903 So.2d 928, 932 (Fla.2005). Former husband contends the proper standard of review is…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Troxel v. GranvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Beagle v. BeagleSupreme Court of Florida · 1996
- Wade v. HirschmanSupreme Court of Florida · 2005
- Beharry v. DrakeDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Pena v. RodriguezDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2019
- J.N.S. v. A.M.A.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016
- Turnier v. StockmanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014
- Department of Revenue ex rel. Mash v. IngramDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013
- J.L.B. v. S.J.B.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.