Ruyle v. Continental Oil Co.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
SEYMOUR, Chief Judge.
Continental Oil Co. (Conoco) appeals the district court’s refusal to hold plaintiffs’ action collaterally estopped by a prior decision of the Oklahoma Corporation Commission. We conclude that the district court erred in failing to give the Corporation Commission order preclusive effect, and we therefore reverse.
I
Robert and Elizabeth Ruyle, Harvey and Marjorie Fransen, George and Yvonne Fran-*840sen, and James M. Fransen (plaintiffs) own mineral interests underlying certain portions of section 14 in Custer County, Oklahoma. Continental Oil Co. (Conoco) is the lessee of the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Landes Construction Co., Inc., Plaintiff-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Royal Bank of Canada, Defendant-Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Richardson Engineering Co. v. William L. Crow Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- George W. Jurgens and Margaret M. Jurgens v. Timothy McKasy D/B/A Tonka Marketing and Cbk, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
- John W. Whalen v. Unit Rig, Inc., a Delaware Corporation Terex Corporation, a Delaware Corporation Mrl Acquisition Corporation, a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
- L. A. Gear, Inc. v. Thom McAn Shoe Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Porous Media Corporation v. Pall CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
- Keylon v. City of AlbuquerqueCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
- Steven L. Wilson v. Union Pacific Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
- Fransen v. Conoco, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
- Marc A. Bell v. Dillard Department Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.