Legal Opinion

Glidden v. Goodfellow

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 19, 1913No. Nos. 18,331—(149)PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Action in the district court for Hennepin county to recover $25,-000. Erom an order Hale, L, sustaining the demurrer of defendant Goódfellow, plaintiff appealed.

1Opinion of the Court

Brown, C. I.

The facts in the case, reduced to their last analysis, as shown by the allegations. of the complaint, and so far as here important, are as follows: Defendant Goodfellow by a lease of certain premises to the Smith Typewriter Co., to be occupied by the tenant as a dealer *102in typewriters and typewriter supplies, covenanted and agreed to supply the premises with heat during the cold weather season from a heating plant owned and operated by him. The tenant took possession under this contract, and the covenant to heat the same was in part the consideration of the rents agreed to be paid…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Swords v. . EdgarNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
  2. Gorrell v. Greensboro Water Supply Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1899
  3. Pond v. . New Rochelle Water Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1906
  4. Howsmon v. Trenton Water Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1893
  5. Albert v. State ex rel. RyanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1887

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Cook v. SeidenvergWashington Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Keegan v. G. Heileman Brewing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
  3. Keiper v. AndersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
  4. Hutchinson Ex Rel. Estate of Hutchinson v. Des Moines Housing Corp.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1957
  5. Glidden v. Second Avenue Investment Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1914

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API