Glidden v. Second Avenue Investment Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Action in the district court for Hennepin county against the Second Avenue Investment Co. and William E. Goodfellow to recover $25,000. The substance of the complaint is stated at the beginning of the opinion. The motion of the investment company for judgment on tbe pleadings was granted, Dickinson, J. From tbe judgment entered pursuant to the order for judgment, plaintiff appealed.
1Opinion of the Court
Hallam, J.. Plaintiff appeals from a judgment on the pleadings in favor of the defendant Second Avenue Investment Co. The complaint alleges in substance that in December, 1909, the defendant Investment Co. owned a building in Minneapolis; that it leased the ground 'floor for five years to the L. C. Smith & Bros. Typewriter Co. for use as an office and salesroom, and agreed to keep in the building proper steam warming apparatus and to keep the premises comfortably warm at all seasons when required; that thereafter defendant Good-fellow, by mesne transfers and assignments, acquired all of the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Jones v. ParkerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1895
- Cargill v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1894
- Fisher v. DeeringIllinois Supreme Court · 1871
- Leominster Gas Light Co. v. HilleryMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1908
- Lindley v. DakinIndiana Supreme Court · 1859
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Peters v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1945
- Keegan v. G. Heileman Brewing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
- Higgenbotham v. TopelCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1973
- Obermeier v. MattisonOregon Supreme Court · 1920
- Hansman v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.