Legal Opinion

Schactman v. State Division of Housing & Community Renewal, Office of Rent Administration

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided August 25, 1988PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

— Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Carmen Beauchamp Ciparick, J.), entered March 27, 1987, which granted the petition to the extent of remanding the matter to respondent to determine if the owner of the subject premises is financially solvent so that the tenant is assured of receiving the refund of rent overcharges from the owner or, in the event the owner is not financially sound, whether it is necessary to order that the entire amount of rent overcharges be offset against future rents paid, unanimously reversed, on the law, and the petition dismissed, without costs.

RPAPL article…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Cale Development Co. v. Conciliation & Appeals BoardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  2. Cale Development Co. v. Conciliation & Appeals BoardNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. Mid-State Management Corp. v. New York City Conciliation & Appeals BoardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  4. MATTER OF MID-STATE MGMT. CORP. v. New York City Conciliation & Appeals Bd.New York Court of Appeals · 1985
  5. Department of Housing Preservation & Development v. SartorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Fourth Federal Savings Bank v. 32-22 Owners Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  2. Zev Cohen, LLC v. Fidelity National Title InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API