Legal Opinion

United States v. Johnson

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided March 29, 2019No. 17-4083; 17-4093; 18-4036PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MURPHY, Circuit Judge.

I. Introduction

The three consolidated appeals currently before this court involve an action brought by the Government to collect unpaid federal estate taxes. In Appeal No. 17-4083, the Government appeals from the district court's determination that its state-law contract claim was time-barred because it was subject to a Utah state six-year state statute of limitations. Exercising jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , we conclude the state-law claim is governed by the ten-year statute of limitations set out in 26 U.S.C. § 6502 (a) because the Government is proceeding in…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Commissioner, Immigration & Naturalization Service v. JeanSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. Ardestani v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. United States v. SummerlinSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  5. United States v. BotefuhrCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. United States v. Henco Holding Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2021
  2. G.H. Daniels & Associates v. PizzellaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2019
  3. In Re SECRETARY OF THE ARMYCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2024
  4. In Re: Anthony J NicolausDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 2022
  5. Turner v. Oklahoma County Board of Comm.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2020

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API