Bidwell v. Sonoma County Transportation Co.
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Sonoma County, vacating and setting aside an order granting a new trial. Emmett Seawell, Judge. • Affirmed. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtLennon, P. J.
Action for damages for personal injuries suffered by plaintiff, Mattie Bidwell, wife of S. J. Bidwell, coplaintiff, and for consequential injury flowing therefrom to the latter.
The action was tried by a jury and resulted in a verdict for plaintiffs, which was rendered March 11, 1916. The defendant made a motion for a new trial. The order granting it was filed June 13, 1916. This order was signed by the judge of the trial court on the previous day, and was on said day delivered by him to the shorthand reporter of the court with instructions to file the same on the following day, which was…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- People v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- People v. GreeneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- Carpenter v. Superior Court of San Joaquin Cty.California Supreme Court · 1888
- In re the Arbitration between Kreiss & HotalingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- People v. GreeneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
3Cited by5 opinions
- Alford v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- Shepherd v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
- People v. RigaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- Holquin v. AllisonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
- Voinich v. PoeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921