Stalcup v. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co.
Indiana Court of Appeals
Prom the Greene Circuit Court
1Opinion of the Court
Wiley J.
The appellant, being a minor, brought this action by his next friend, to recover damages, alleged to have been received while riding on appellee’s railroad. The complaint is in two paragraphs, to each of which the appellee addressed a demurrer, which was sustained by the trial court, and an exception reserved. • The appellant refusing to plead over, the court rendered judgment for appellee for its costs, and the appellant appealed. The error assigned is the sustaining of the demurrer to each paragraph of the complaint.
The first paragraph of the complaint avers that the appellee was…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- City of Indianapolis v. EmmelmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
- Penso v. McCormickIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
- Eaton v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
- Dunn v. Grand Trunk Railway Co. of CanadaSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1870
- Thiele v. McManusIndiana Court of Appeals · 1891
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Chicago & Erie Railroad v. HamerickIndiana Court of Appeals · 1911
- Pennsylvania Co. v. CoyerIndiana Supreme Court · 1904
- Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. HallIndiana Court of Appeals · 1910
- Dempsey v. TestIndiana Court of Appeals · 1933
- Lewis v. YoungIndiana Court of Appeals · 1932
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.