Legal Opinion

Palmer v. White

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 28, 1989No. 50-87-09812; CA A50884PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtGraber, P. J.

Defendant is the personal representative of testatrix’ estate. He appeals a judgment that declared that plaintiffs “partial disclaimers” are valid and that the disclaimed property passes to her immediately, and free from trust, under Article VII of the will. We affirm.

The facts are not in dispute. Testatrix had two children, a son and plaintiff. The son predeceased testatrix without issue. After testatrix died, the court admitted her will to probate and, in accordance with it, appointed defendant personal representative.

Articles I through V and IX through XII of the will concern general…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Wilmington Trust Company v. CarpenterCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1974
  2. Carpenter Foundation, Inc. v. Wilmington Trust CompanySupreme Court of Delaware · 1974
  3. In Re the Estate of BurmeisterSupreme Court of Kansas · 1979

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Fleenor v. WilliamsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API