Legal Opinion

United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Department of Industrial Relations

California Supreme Court

Decided April 29, 1929No. Docket No. S.F. 13189PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCurtis, J.

This proceeding was instituted for the purpose of having reviewed and annulled a certain order made by the Department of Industrial Relations, Division of Industrial Accidents and Safety. By section 364b of the Political Code, as amended in 1927 (Stats. 1927, p. 734, sec. 3), the Department of Industrial Relations has succeeded to all the powers vested in the Industrial Accident Commission by the Workmen’s Compensation, Insurance and Safety Act of 1917 (Stats. 1917, p. 831), and acts amendatory thereof. On November 19, 1923, the respondent William Hardy was injured while in the employ of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Union Iron Works v. Industrial Accident CommisionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Eberle v. MillerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
  3. Garratt-Callahan Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Howard v. Harwood's Restaurant Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1957
  2. Braewood Convalescent Hospital v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Brollier v. Van AlstineMissouri Court of Appeals · 1942
  4. Flock v. J. C. Palumbo Fruit Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Postal Telegraph Cable Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API