State v. Hunter
Nebraska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFahrnbruch, J.
Claiming the Douglas County Court failed to sequester the prosecution’s witnesses, as mandated by Neb. Rev. Stat. § 27-615 (Reissue 1989), Carol Hunter appeals her convictions for violation of two municipal dog ordinances in Omaha.
The defendant’s appeal to this court was preceded by an appeal to the district court for Douglas County, where Hunter’s convictions were affirmed.
Because the defendant failed to perfect her appeal from the county court in accordance with Nebraska statutes, the district court acquired no jurisdiction to hear the case. Since the district court lacked jurisdiction,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- In Re Interest of NLBNebraska Supreme Court · 1990
- In Re Interest of KDBNebraska Supreme Court · 1989
- Rorick Partnership v. HaugNebraska Supreme Court · 1988
3Cited by6 opinions
- Creighton St. Joseph Regional Hospital v. Nebraska Tax Equalization & Review CommissionNebraska Supreme Court · 2000
- State v. DallmannNebraska Supreme Court · 2000
- In Re Estate of SeidlerNebraska Supreme Court · 1992
- State v. HaaseNebraska Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. HanusNebraska Court of Appeals · 1995
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.