Legal Opinion
Hohensee v. Grier
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Decided April 11, 1974No. Civ. 71-209PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MUIR, District Judge.
Ervin Hohensee and his sisters, Thelma Tompkins and Alma Arzoo, filed this pro se complaint seeking damages, injunctions and declaratory relief against the named Defendants who have allegedly deprived Plaintiffs of various property and other constitutional rights. The complaint originally asserted jurisdiction under the Civil Rights Act, 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and 28 U.S.C. § 1343. Subsequently, Plaintiffs were permitted to amend the complaint to assert diversity of citizenship as an alternative jurisdictional ground. By Opinion and Order dated April 5, 1974, the Court…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Aetna Life Insurance v. HaworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Commissioner v. SunnenSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. Pacific Coal & Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- United States v. ClassicSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Taylor v. First Wyoming Bank, N.A.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- Oxendine v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989
- In Re KovalchickUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1994
- Scutieri v. Estate of RevitzDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1988
- Conroy v. Manos, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1984
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.