Legal Opinion
Conroy v. Manos
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)
Decided September 18, 1984No. 05-83-00316-CVPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GUILLOT, Justice.
Appellee’s motion for rehearing is granted. Our prior opinion is withdrawn, and the following is now our opinion.
This is an appeal from the granting of a motion for directed verdict in a suit for an alleged conversion and for the alleged denial of Cathey Conroy’s constitutional rights. For the reasons below, we affirm.
In her first two points of error, Conroy contends that the evidence either established conversion as a matter of law or was sufficient for the special issues to be. submitted to the jury. The evidence showed that Conroy failed to pay Peter Manos rent in October,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Lugar v. Edmondson Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Lynch v. Household Finance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Fender v. SchadedCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1967
- Little v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Dargis v. Paradise Park, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2004
- Conroy v. Manos, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1984
- Dargis v. Paradise Park, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2004
- Laws, Rhea H. and Union Planters Bank, NA, Danny Hilal and First Capital Interest L.L.C. v. Bailey, Johnny, Casandra Bailey and Ruby Ford, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2002
- Threadgill v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1951
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.