Legal Opinion

Blass v. Waldrip

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 1, 1934No. 24705. Department TwoPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBlake, J.

— October 21, 1931, plaintiff and defendants entered into a written contract, whereby plaintiff agreed to sell and defendants agreed to buy 100,500 shares of the stock of the Blass Oyster Company. The consideration agreed upon was the payment, to be made by defendants, of the sum of $160 per month ‘ ‘ during the remainder of the natural life of the seller.” The contract contained a forfeiture clause, reading as follows:

“In the event of failure of buyers or their assigns to make each and all of the payments provided for herein, all of the said stock shall be returned to seller and all payments…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Asia Investment Co. v. LevinWashington Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Stewart & Holmes Drug Co. v. ReedWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Moore v. ParkerWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Hapeman v. McNealWashington Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Bruce v. Grays Harbor Drug Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1912

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Peterson v. PaulsonWashington Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Puget Mill Co. v. KerryWashington Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Save-Way Drug, Inc. v. Standard Investment Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1971
  4. Slater v. MurphyWashington Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Friend v. Continental Coal Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1936

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API