Legal Opinion · Dissent

Barbara E. Kimmel, Administratrix of the Estate of Frank C. Kimmel, Deceased v. Yankee Lines, a Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided July 15, 1955No. 11511Published

1DissentHastie, Circuit Judge

In my judgment the District Court should not have afforded a second opportunity to contest the issue of fault in this collision after the same parties, Yankee Lines and Kimmel’s administratrix, had had opportunity and occasion to con*647test that very issue in a Pennsylvania state court which had decided against the administratrix.

In simplified statement the essential facts are these. A fatal accident occurred on a Pennsylvania highway. A vehicle owned by A, the present defendant Yankee Lines, collided with a vehicle driven by B, of whose estate the present plaintiff is administratrix. B was…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Angel v. BullingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. King v. Order of United Commercial Travelers of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  3. Bruszewski v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1950
  4. Hartmann v. Time, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1948
  5. Hochman v. Mortgage Finance Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API