Legal Opinion

Joe Villarreal v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 1, 1972No. 71-2374PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

On March 3, 1965, appellant was charged with nine counts of bank robbery (18 U.S.C. § 2113(a) (d)) to which he pleaded not guilty. On March 29, 1965, represented by counsel, he pleaded guilty to two of the counts, and the remaining counts were dismissed. The court thereafter sentenced him to 20 years on one count and 10 years on the other, the sentences to run consecutively.

In June 1967, appellant filed a section 2255 application asserting that his guilty plea had been involuntary because the court had not complied with Rule 11 and because his plea had been induced by an agreement under which…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Sanders v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. MacHibroda v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  5. Johnson v. AverySupreme Court of the United States · 1969

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Vernon C. Weygandt v. Donald Look, Superintendent, and the Attorney General for the State of WashingtonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
  2. United States v. Aron Edward DonnCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
  3. Jess Cancino v. Walter E. CravenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972
  4. Joe Villarreal v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
  5. J. Loyd Parker, Jr. v. W. J. Estelle, Jr., Director, Texas Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API