Legal Opinion

Merten v. Merten

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 1, 1937No. Docket No. 48, Calendar No. 39,287PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPotter, J.

Plaintiff filed a bill for divorce against defendant who appeared and filed an answer and a cross-bill. The case was placed at issue and tried. The trial court announced it would grant a decree to defendant upon her cross-bill, and the basis of the contemplated decree as to settlement of property matters. Defendant and appellant then sought to dismiss her cross-bill, against plaintiff’s objection. This, the trial court refused to permit appellant to do and entered a decree in accordance with his findings, and from this decree defendant appeals.

Defendant bases her right to dismiss her…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Pear v. GrahamMichigan Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Castator v. Boyes & Blandford Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1923

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Sheffer v. ShefferMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
  2. Goodspeed v. GoodspeedMichigan Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Shields v. ShieldsMichigan Supreme Court · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API