Legal Opinion

Miller v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided March 7, 1970No. 45,552PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Kaul, J.:

This is a garnishment action in which plaintiff-appellee recovered a judgment in the district court against the garnishee, State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (hereafter referred to as insurer or State Farm).

The overall issue is whether the provisions of the Kansas Motor Vehicle Safety Responsibility Act (herein designated as the Act) K. S. A. 8-722, et seq., and in particular 8-750 (b), now 1969 Supp. (commonly called “the omnibus clause” provision) apply to an automobile liability insurance policy issued by State Farm to the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Jenkins v. Mayflower Insurance ExchangeArizona Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Protective Fire and Casualty Company v. CorneliusNebraska Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Agee v. Kansas Highway Commission Motor Vehicle DepartmentSupreme Court of Kansas · 1967
  4. Gabler v. Continental Casualty CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1956
  5. Bohrn v. State Farm Etc. Ins. Co.California Court of Appeal · 1964

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Estate of Neal Ex Rel. Delgado v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeNevada Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Farmers Alliance Mutual Insurance Company v. Mary Bakke, Johnny Bakke, Jo Lynn Wood, Karla Vigil and Lawrence VigilCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1980
  3. Canal Insurance Co. v. SinclairSupreme Court of Kansas · 1972
  4. Garza v. Glen Falls InsuranceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Grimes v. Government Employees InsuranceIndiana Court of Appeals · 1980

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API