Legal Opinion · Dissent

Donajkowski v. Alpena Power Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 30, 1999No. 108468, Calendar No. 2Published

1DissentKelly, J.

The majority has erred by holding that an employer, sued for discrimination under a collective bargaining agreement, may seek contribution from the union that negotiated the agree*265ment. The majority’s response unfortunately misrepresents my position, inter alia, by stating, “the dissent would hold that a union may conspire to discriminate on the basis of sex, and, when called to account at the bar of justice for its role in that conspiracy by the others charged, escape liability.” Ante at 254. It goes almost without saying that plaintiffs are entitled to file a discrimination claim against…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Northwest Airlines, Inc. v. Transport Workers UnionSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Radtke v. EverettMichigan Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Frankenmuth Mutual Insurance v. Marlette Homes, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Caldwell v. FoxMichigan Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Oakland County Board v. Michigan Property & Casualty Guaranty Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 1998

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API