Legal Opinion

People v. Jones

Criminal Court of the City of New York

Decided July 18, 2011PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Robert M. Mandelbaum, J.

The results of an otherwise-reliable chemical test are not rendered inadmissible at an intoxicated-driving trial just because the device used to perform the test is capable of being moved.

Defendant was tried before a jury on charges of driving while intoxicated and ability impaired by the consumption of alcohol (see Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1192 [3], [1]). Prior to the commencement of trial, the People moved in limine, over defendant’s objection, to introduce evidence that at the time of his arrest, defendant had .09 of one percent by weight of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. People v. MertzNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  2. People v. BoscicNew York Court of Appeals · 2010
  3. People v. ThomasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  4. People v. LebrechtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2006
  5. People v. ThomasNew York Court of Appeals · 1987

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. AliajNew York Supreme Court · 2012
  2. People v. SantiagoNew York Supreme Court · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API