Legal Opinion

People v. Aliaj

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 21, 2012PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Daniel P. Conviser, J.

Introduction

Multiple trial courts have wrestled with the question of whether the results of a test which has been approved as valid to measure a defendant’s blood alcohol content but is adminis*684tered at the scene of a vehicle stop, rather than at a police precinct with all of the traditional protocols of a chemical test, is admissible at trial. At least four trial courts have held that the results of such “portable breath tests” (PBTs) are never admissible at trial. (See People v Reed, 5 Misc 3d 1032[A], 2004 NY Slip Op 51662[U] [Sup Ct, Bronx County…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People v. CampbellNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
  2. People v. BoscicNew York Court of Appeals · 2010
  3. People v. LebrechtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2006
  4. People v. HampeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  5. People v. WilliamsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. SantiagoNew York Supreme Court · 2014
  2. People v. GeorgeCriminal Court of the City of New York · 2015
  3. People v. GintherNew York Supreme Court · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API