Legal Opinion

United States v. Taylor

District Court, D. New Mexico

Decided March 26, 2009No. CR 07-1244WJPublished

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR DISCOVERY OF RACIALLY DISPROPORTIONATE CAPITAL PROSECUTION AUTHORIZATION

WILLIAM P. JOHNSON, District Judge.

THIS MATTER comes before the Court upon Defendant Taylor’s Motion for Discovery of Racially Disproportionate Capital Prosecution Authorization, filed February 16, 2009 (Doc. 161). Having considered the parties’ briefs and the applicable law, I find that Defendant’s motion is not well-taken and will be denied on the grounds that Defendant has not made the required showing under United States v. Armstrong, 517 U.S. 456, 465, 116 S.Ct. 1480,…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. National Labor Relations Board v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. McCleskey v. KempSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. United States v. NoblesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. United States v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  5. Wayte v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API