Legal Opinion
Phoebe Putney Memorial Hospital, Inc. v. Roach
Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided February 17, 1997No. S96A1487, S96A1512 and S96A1513PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Thompson, Justice.
The question posed by these appeals is whether a mobile cardiac catheterization unit which was “grandfathered” and exempt from obtaining a certificate of need when it began operating in Vidalia, Georgia, must obtain a certificate of need in order to operate in Albany, Georgia. The answer is “yes.”
Cardiology Associates of Savannah, PC. (“CAS”), operates a mobile cardiac catheterization unit. Initially, CAS operated its unit at Meadows Memorial Hospital in Vidalia, Georgia. Because that unit was in operation before January 1, 1992, CAS was “grandfathered” into the certificate…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- HCA Health Services of Georgia, Inc. v. RoachSupreme Court of Georgia · 1995
- HCA Health Services, Inc. v. RoachSupreme Court of Georgia · 1994
- Chattahoochee Valley Home Health Care, Inc. v. Healthmaster, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
3Cited by9 opinions
- Catonsville Nursing Home, Inc. v. LovemanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1998
- North Fulton Medical Center, Inc. v. StephensonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1998
- Department of Community Health, Division of Health Planning v. Gwinnett Hospital System, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2003
- Albany Surgical, P.C. v. Department of Community HealthCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2002
- North Atlanta Scan Associates, Inc. v. Department of Community HealthCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.