State v. Waiters
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Mary J. Boyle, Presiding Judge.
{¶ 1} Defendant-appellant, Charles Waiters, appeals the amount of restitution the trial court ordered him to pay as part of his sentence. Waiters raises two issues on appeal:
{¶ 2} “[1.] The trial court erred when it imposed a $14,674.23 restitution order without an adequate evidentiary basis for the amount imposed.
{¶ 3} “[2.] The trial court erred in failing to hold an adequate restitution hearing when the defendant disputed the amount.”
{¶ 4} Finding merit to his appeal, we reverse and remand for an evidentiary hearing on the amount of restitution.
Procedural…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Blakemore v. BlakemoreOhio Supreme Court · 1983
- State v. AdamsOhio Supreme Court · 1980
- State v. UnderwoodOhio Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. WarnerOhio Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. MartinOhio Court of Appeals · 2000
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State v. ThorntonOhio Court of Appeals · 2017
- State v. SpeightsOhio Court of Appeals · 2021
- State v. LindseyOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
- State v. SimmonsOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
- State v. AlbaughOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.