Legal Opinion

State v. Waiters

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided November 24, 2010No. 93897PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mary J. Boyle, Presiding Judge.

{¶ 1} Defendant-appellant, Charles Waiters, appeals the amount of restitution the trial court ordered him to pay as part of his sentence. Waiters raises two issues on appeal:

{¶ 2} “[1.] The trial court erred when it imposed a $14,674.23 restitution order without an adequate evidentiary basis for the amount imposed.

{¶ 3} “[2.] The trial court erred in failing to hold an adequate restitution hearing when the defendant disputed the amount.”

{¶ 4} Finding merit to his appeal, we reverse and remand for an evidentiary hearing on the amount of restitution.

Procedural…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Blakemore v. BlakemoreOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  2. State v. AdamsOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  3. State v. UnderwoodOhio Supreme Court · 2010
  4. State v. WarnerOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  5. State v. MartinOhio Court of Appeals · 2000

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. ThorntonOhio Court of Appeals · 2017
  2. State v. SpeightsOhio Court of Appeals · 2021
  3. State v. LindseyOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
  4. State v. SimmonsOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
  5. State v. AlbaughOhio Court of Appeals · 2013

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API