Legal Opinion

State v. Thornton

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided May 31, 2017No. C-160501PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Zayas, Judge.

{¶ 1} Defendant-appellant Tajuana Thornton appeals from the judgment of the trial court convicting her of theft under R.C. 2913.02(A)(1), a fifth-degree felony, sentencing her to serve five years of community control, and ordering her to pay a $250 fine and $5,454.01 in restitution to the victims, John and Merri Gerke. In her sole assignment of error, Thornton asserts that the trial court abused its discretion in ordering her to pay $5,454.01 in restitution. Because we find that the Gerkes had not suffered an economic loss, we hold that the trial court's order of restitution was…

Also in this document: Concurrence · Mock; Concurrence · Myers.

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. State v. Marcum (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Cleveland Electric Illuminating Co. v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  3. State v. WhiteOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
  4. State v. MartinOhio Court of Appeals · 2000
  5. State v. NitscheOhio Court of Appeals · 2016

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. State v. CaldwellOhio Court of Appeals · 2023
  2. State v. HayesOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
  3. State v. AdamsOhio Court of Appeals · 2019
  4. State v. CartwrightOhio Court of Appeals · 2017
  5. State v. AllenOhio Court of Appeals · 2018

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API