Legal Opinion
Abbott Point of Care Inc. v. Epocal, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided January 13, 2012No. 2011-1024PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the court filed by Chief Judge RADER. Dissenting opinion filed by Circuit Judge BRYSON.
RADER, Chief Judge.
The United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama granted Epoeal, Inc.’s (“Epoeal”) Motion to Dismiss and dismissed Abbott Point of Care Inc.’s (“Abbott”) Complaint without prejudice. Because Abbott lacks standing, this court affirms.
I
Abbott filed a complaint against Epoeal in the Northern District of Alabama alleging infringement of U.S. Patent Nos. 6,845,327 ('327 patent) entitled “PoinWOfCare In-Vitro Blood Analysis System” and 6,896,778 ('778 patent)…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- United Technologies Corp. v. MazerCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2009
- Rite-Hite Corp. v. Kelley Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Metabolite Laboratories, Inc. And Competitive Technologies, Inc. v. Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings (Doing Business as Labcorp)Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
- Kampf v. Franklin Life InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
- Conway v. 287 Corporate Center AssociatesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2006
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Intellectual Ventures I LLC v. Erie Indemnity CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2017
- Intellectual Ventures I LLC v. Erie Indemnity Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2015
- Eurand, Inc. v. Impax Laboratories, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2013
- Beavers v. Riley Built, Inc.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2016
- Carnegie Mellon University v. Marvell Technology Group, Ltd.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2012
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.