Legal Opinion
Carnegie Mellon University v. Marvell Technology Group, Ltd.
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Decided November 2, 2012No. Civil Action No. 09-290PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM ORDER
NORA BARRY FISCHER, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
This patent infringement action is set to commence jury selection and trial on November 26, 2012. The parties have filed a number of motions in limine seeking pretrial rulings on the admissibility of certain evidence at trial. This opinion addresses Defendants’ (collectively “Marvell”) “Motion In Limine No. Dll Re: Precluding CMU From Introducing Evidence of Compliance With 35 U.S.C. § 287(a).” (Docket No. 520). By this motion, Marvell seeks to preclude Plaintiff Carnegie Mellon University (“CMU”) from introducing evidence or…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Murphy v. Duquesne University of Holy GhostSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- W. Channing Nicholas, M.D. v. Pennsylvania State UniversityCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
- Activevideo Networks, Inc. v. Verizon Communications, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
- Susan M. Maxwell v. J. Baker, Inc., and Prange Way, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Michigan Motor Technologies, LLC v. Bayerische Motoren Werke AGDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2023