Legal Opinion

Vance v. City of Hoover

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

Decided April 12, 1990PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In a trial de novo in Jefferson Circuit Court, a jury convicted Gary Dee Vance of driving under the influence of alcohol. He was fined $400 and was ordered to pay court costs and to attend DUI school. The only issue raised on this appeal concerns the trial court's denial of the ground of the motion for new trial alleging an improper amendment of the charge.

Subsection (a) of § 32-5A-191, Ala. Code (1975), provides in pertinent part that "[a] person shall not drive or be in actual physical control of any vehicle while: (1) There is 0.10 percent or more by weight of alcohol in his blood [or] (2)…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Ex Parte WashingtonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1984
  2. Gwin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1982
  3. Ex Parte GwinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1983
  4. Ex Parte StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1988
  5. Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1978

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Carnold v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1992
  2. Samra v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1999
  3. Frazier v. City of MontgomeryCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1990
  4. Shanklin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2014
  5. Wesson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1994

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API