Legal Opinion
Skorka v. AMICA Mutual Insurance
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided August 30, 1989No. 88-504PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBatchelder, J.
The defendant, AMICA Mutual Insurance Company (AMICA), appeals a decision of the Superior Court {Dalianis, J.) granting the plaintiffs cross-motion for summary judgment and requiring the defendant to provide coverage and a defense for the plaintiffs automobile accident case, as well as awarding the plaintiff attorney’s fees. We reverse.
The facts of this case are not in dispute. The plaintiff, Patricia A. Skorka, rented a truck from Q.C. Rental d/b/a Budget Rent-A-Car (Q.C. Rental). While operating the truck, the plaintiff collided with the roof of a drive-in bank in Concord, damaging both the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Security Mutual Casualty Co. v. JohnsonTexas Supreme Court · 1979
- Speier Et Ux. v. AylingSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
- Wyatt v. WyattSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
- American Casualty Co. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1968
- Farmland Mutual Insurance Co. v. Farmers Elevator, Inc. of Grace CityNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- First Londonderry Development Corp. v. CNA Insurance CompaniesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1995
- Cam-Sam Real Estate Holding, LLC, Plaintiff v. Merchants Mutual Insurance Company and Hartford Fire Insurance Company, Defendants Sentinel Insurance Company, Ltd. a/k/a Hartford Fire Insurance Company, Counter Claimant and Third Party Plaintiff v. Cam-Sam Real Estate Holding, LLC, Counter Defendant, and D La Pooch Hotel, LLC, n/k/a D La Pooch Resort, LLC, and Lindsey Todt, Third Party DefendantsDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2019
- Founders Insurance Co. v. WalkerAppellate Court of Illinois · 2015
- Cam-Sam Real Estate Holding, LLC v. Merchants Mutual Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2019