Legal Opinion

United States v. Paul A. Dudley and Nancy J. Dudley

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided October 13, 1978No. 77-5102PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GODBOLD, Circuit Judge:

This 'case requires us to interpret 18 U.S.C. § 1623(a), which makes criminal various types of activity before a court or grand jury:

Whoever under oath ... in any proceeding before or ancillary to any court or grand jury of the United States knowingly makes any false material declaration or makes or uses any other information, including any book, paper, document, record, recording, or other material, knowing the same to contain any false material declaration .

The Fifth Circuit has often reviewed convictions under the false declarations provision of § 1623(a). Here we…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. United States v. DotterweichSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. United States v. Universal C. I. T. Credit Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
  3. Heflin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  4. Milanovich v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  5. United States v. Joseph P. CandellaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. United States v. Joseph Lichenstein and Leo BellaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
  2. Bingham, Ltd. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984
  3. United States v. John R. SwaimCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
  4. United States v. CorbinCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984
  5. State v. RosadoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API