Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Aldrighetti v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided March 27, 1974No. 47735Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partOnion, Presiding Judge

Appellant’s initial contention is that the court erred in permitting him to be impeached by a prior void misdemeanor conviction for unlawfully carrying a pistol.

After his direct examination, the State, in absence of the jury, informed the court that it wanted “to test this man’s credibility by the question as to moral turpitude.” There was then some discussion of a prior marihuana conviction where appellant had been granted probation and a conviction for unlawfully carrying a concealed weapon. The court warned the prosecutor to act in good faith and to check the court records as to the latter…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Argersinger v. HamlinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Bustillos v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1971
  3. Ramirez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1972
  4. St. Jules v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1969
  5. Curry v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1972

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API