St. Jules v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WOODLEY, Presiding Judge.
The offense is burglary; the punishment, enhanced under Art. 63, Vernon’s Ann.P.C., life.
Trial was before a jury on a plea of not guilty. The jury having found him guilty, appellant elected to have the court assess the punishment. Evidence, including the admission and stipulation by appellant proving the allegations of the indictment as to two prior convictions of burglary, was introduced and the punishment was assessed at life.
Appellant’s first ground of error is that the trial court erred in overruling his motion to quash the indictment “for the reason that…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Steward v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1968
3Cited by37 opinions
- State v. MooreCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2007
- Zaragosa v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979
- Howard J. St. Jules v. Dr. George J. Beto, Director, Texas Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
- Jones v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1973
- Resendez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1975
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.