Andrews v. Bechtel Construction Co.

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Wertz, J.:

This was a workmens compensation case. The trial court made findings of fact and allowed compensation. Respondents bring the case here and contend (1) the evidence was insufficient to sustain the court’s finding that claimant’s disability was a direct result of an accidental injury suffered in the course of his employment and (2) they were prejudiced for want of statutory notice of the injury. The pertinent part of the court’s findings to which respondents take exception is as follows:

“The court further finds that the claimant, Ott Andrews,…