Legal Opinion
In Re Senate Bill 177
Supreme Court of Vermont
Decided July 28, 1972No. 73-72PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Per curiam
Responding to the petition in the above entitled matter challenging the reapportionment of the Senate of the General Assembly of the State of Vermont as provided for in Senate Bill 177, following argument before this Court, an opinion was rendered and filed July 13, 1972, wherein it was determined that Senate Bill 177 did not meet constitutional standards. 130 Vt. 358, 294 A.2d 653. The opinion was certified to the Legislative Apportionment Board with directions that the plan of reapportionment be modified in accordance'with the views therein expressed and that the board’s report be submitted…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Reynolds v. SimsSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Swann v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Wells v. RockefellerSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Kilgarlin v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- In Re Reapportionment of Town of HartlandSupreme Court of Vermont · 1993
- In Re ParizoSupreme Court of Vermont · 1979
- In Re Senate Bill 177Supreme Court of Vermont · 1974
- In Re Reapportionment of Town of HartlandSupreme Court of Vermont · 1993
- In Re Reapportionment of Town of HartlandSupreme Court of Vermont · 1993
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.