Krenz v. Lee
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Action in-the district court for Traverse county to recover $1,654.-90 paid by plaintiff upon certain promissory notes which, he alleged, he had given in payment of a gasolene engine and separator which were not as represented in the contract of sale. The case was tried before Flaherty, J., who directed the jury to return a verdict in favor of defendant. From an order denying his motion for a new trial, plaintiff appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtStart, C. J.
The complaint alleged, in effect, that on August 4, 1905, the plaintiff entered into a contract with the defendant for the purchase from him of a steam threshing outfit, consisting of a gasolene engine and separator, with attachments, for the sum of $1,550; that the defendant warranted the outfit to do good work, and it was agreed between the parties that-the plaintiff should take it on trial, and if it did not com*456ply with the warranty and work to his satisfaction there was to be no sale, and he could return it; that the plaintiff made his negotiable promissory notes for the purchase price of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- McCormick Harvesting Machine Co. v. ChesrownSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1884
- In re Hess' EstateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1894
- Giermann v. St. Paul, Minneapolis & Manitoba Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
- Scheiber v. Chicago, St. Raul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
- Alfred Shrimpton & Sons v. PhilbrickSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Teal v. Scandinavian-American BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1911
- Osborn v. WillSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
- Wilcox v. SchisslerMontana Supreme Court · 1918
- Bayerkohler v. Clara City Farmers Elevator Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1933
- Smith v. KimbleSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1913
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.