Legal Opinion

Heise v. Schulz

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided April 9, 1949No. 37,509PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Arn, J.;

Plaintiff seeks a mandatory injunction to compel defendants to remove certain dams which they have placed in and across the bed of Eagle Tail creek. The trial court made findings of fact, refused the mandatory injunction prayed for by plaintiff, and rendered judgment for defendants. The plaintiff has appealed. For convenience we will refer to the parties as plaintiff and defendants, as they appeared at the trial below. ■

The plaintiff’s petition prayed for a mandatory injunction commanding the defendants to 'immediately remove all of their…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Clark v. AllamanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1905
  2. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. ShriverSupreme Court of Kansas · 1917
  3. State v. Kansas State Board of AgricultureSupreme Court of Kansas · 1944
  4. Frizell v. BindleySupreme Court of Kansas · 1936
  5. Campbell v. GrimesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1901

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Williams v. City of WichitaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1962
  2. State ex rel. Emery v. KnappSupreme Court of Kansas · 1949
  3. Weaver v. Beech Aircraft CorporationSupreme Court of Kansas · 1956
  4. Williams v. City of WichitaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1962
  5. Williams v. City of WichitaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API