State v. Lange, 10-06-28 (5-14-2007)
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
{¶ 1} Defendant-Appellant, Jesse J. Lange, appeals the judgment of the Mercer County Court of Common Pleas, issuing a nunc pro tunc entry adding discretionary post-release control to his sentence. On appeal, Lange asserts that, if a trial court does not advise a defendant at sentencing that post-release control is or may be imposed, it may not do so through a nunc pro tunc entry at a later date, and that, when a trial court does not impose post-release control at sentencing, the appropriate action is to rule that the defendant is not subject to post-release control. Based on the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State v. FosterOhio Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. JordanOhio Supreme Court · 2004
- State v. BeasleyOhio Supreme Court · 1984
- Hernandez v. KellyOhio Supreme Court · 2006
- Watkins v. CollinsOhio Supreme Court · 2006
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. BealOhio Court of Appeals · 2016
- State v. FiteOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
- City of Toledo v. Kakissis, L-07-1215 (3-21-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
- State v. Gottschall, 10-06-37 (8-6-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
- State v. LangeOhio Supreme Court · 2007
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.