Legal Opinion

State v. Gottschall, 10-06-37 (8-6-2007)

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided August 6, 2007No. Nos. 10-06-37, 10-06-38Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

{¶ 1} Although originally placed on our accelerated calendar, we have elected, pursuant to Local Rule 12(5), to issue a full opinion in lieu of a judgment entry.

{¶ 2} Defendant-Appellant, Mark J. Gottschall, appeals the judgment of the Mercer County Court of Common Pleas denying his motion for resentencing. On appeal, Gottschall asserts that the trial court erred by refusing to resentence him. Finding that Gottschall's sentence is not void and that the trial court did not err by refusing to resentence him, we affirm the judgments of the trial court.

{¶ 3} In June 2003, in case 10-06-37,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Griffith v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Johnson v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1966

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API