Legal Opinion

Keim v. Commonwealth, Department of Transportation, Bureau of Driver Licensing

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 7, 2005PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

Judge SMITH-RIBNER.

In this case of first impression, the Department of Transportation, Bureau of Driver Licensing (DOT) appeals from an order of the Court of Common Pleas of Lehigh County that sustained the statutory appeal of Roy P. Keim from DOT’s order suspending Keim’s operating privilege for six months following notification that he pleaded guilty to the offense of manufacturing a controlled substance. DOT questions whether the trial court erred as a matter of law in ruling that DOT could not suspend Keim’s operating privilege because that offense is not one of the offenses…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Duquesne Light Co. v. BaraschSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Commonwealth v. DuffeySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  3. Plowman v. COM., DEPT. OF TRANSP.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  4. Barasch v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  5. Com., Dept. of Transp. v. TaylorSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2004

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Conchado v. Commonwealth, Department of TransportationCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  2. Lowery v. Port Authority of Allegheny CountyCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  3. Commonwealth, Department of Transportation, Bureau of Driver Licensing v. CoyleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  4. Keim v. COM., DEPT. OF TRANSP.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  5. Rawson v. Commonwealth Department of Transportation, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Chester County2014

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API