Legal Opinion
Castaing v. Puerto Rican American Sugar Refinery, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided November 10, 1944No. 3988PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MAHONEY, Circuit Judge.
The plaintiffs brought this action to recover minimum • and overtime compensation, liquidated damages, attorney’s fees and costs under the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, 52' Stat. 1060, 29 U.S.C.A. § 201 et seq. The defendant, Puerto Rican American Sugar Refinery, Inc., is engaged in the production of raw and refined sugar which was sold or contemplated to be sold in the flow of interstate commerce. In the complaint it is alleged that the plaintiffs at the special instance and request of the defendant “were employed in the washing, ironing, cleaning, preparation and…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- A. B. Kirschbaum Co. v. WallingSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- McLeod v. ThrelkeldSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Walton v. Southern Package Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Musteen v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1943
- Stratton v. Farmers Produce Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1943
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Manosky v. Bethlehem-Hingham Shipyard, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1949
- Garcia v. Hilton Hotels International, Inc.District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1951
- Tipton v. Bearl Sprott Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1949
- Manosky v. Bethlehem-Hingham Shipyard, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1949