Legal Opinion

Olsten Staffing Services, Inc. v. D.A. Stinger Services, Inc.

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided June 27, 1996No. 95-197, 95-198PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMAS, Justice.

The sole issue upon which we resolve these eases is whether the trial judge was deprived of jurisdiction under Wyo. R. Civ. P. 40.1(b)(1) by a motion for peremptory disqualification. Olsten Staffing Services, Inc. (Olsten) failed to answer the complaint of DA. Stinger Services, Inc. (Stinger) within twenty days as required by Wyo. R. Civ. P. 12(a). On the twenty-third day, counsel for Olsten entered an appearance and, on the twenty-seventh day, Olsten filed an answer and a motion to peremptorily disqualify the judge. In the meantime, counsel for Stinger obtained entry of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Matter of Adoption of VossWyoming Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Vanasse v. RamsayWyoming Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Spitzer v. SpitzerWyoming Supreme Court · 1989
  4. State Ex Rel. Pearson v. HansenWyoming Supreme Court · 1966
  5. McGarvin-Moberly Construction Co. v. WeldenWyoming Supreme Court · 1995

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Ultra Resources, Inc. v. HartmanWyoming Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Kalamazoo Oil Co. v. BoermanMichigan Court of Appeals · 2000
  3. Caballo Coal Company v. Fidelity Exploration & Production CompanyWyoming Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Horse Creek Conservation District v. State Ex Rel. Wyoming Attorney GeneralWyoming Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. v. GunterWyoming Supreme Court · 2007

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API