Legal Opinion

Hiatt v. Tomlinson

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided June 3, 1916No. 19339PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from the district court for Holt county: Robert R. Dickson, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtFawcett, J.

This action was instituted by plaintiffs, as taypayers and citizens of Holt county, under the first and sixth subdivisions of section 5698, Rev. St. 1913, to remove defendants from their offices as supervisors of such county.' From a judgment dismissing the action at their costs, plaintiffs appeal.

*52The petition contains two paragraphs. The first simply alleges that plaintiffs are taxpayers and citizens of Holt county. The second is divided into 16 subdivisions. The sixteenth subdivision has been abandoned by plaintiffs in their brief. The first, second, fourth, fifth, sixth, seventh, eighth,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Felton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Wass v. . StephensNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
  3. State ex rel. Barker v. MeekSupreme Court of Iowa · 1910
  4. People ex rel. Metevier v. TherrienMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
  5. State v. HastingsNebraska Supreme Court · 1893

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Connors v. PantanoNebraska Supreme Court · 1957
  2. State ex rel. Good v. MarshNebraska Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Opinion No. (1983), Nebraska Attorney General Reports1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API