Legal Opinion

Connors v. Pantano

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided November 29, 1957No. 34252PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWenke, J.

This is an appeal from the district court for Douglas County. It involves an action wherein Edward K. Connors seeks to recover from Anthony R. Pantano all the damage that was caused to his garage and its contents, located at 3555 Woolworth Street, in Omaha, Nebraska, by a fire. This fire, which occurred on October 13, 1955, plaintiff alleged was intentionally set by defendant’s son, Ross Pantano, who was born on March 19, 1951, and therefore át the time of the fire approximately 4 years and 7 months of age. The plaintiff’s right to recovery is based on section 43-801, R. R. S. 1943.

This…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Barker v. MeekSupreme Court of Iowa · 1910
  2. Tews ex rel. Tews v. BamrickNebraska Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Sall v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Union Transfer Co. v. Bee Line Motor FreightNebraska Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Shaske v. HronWisconsin Supreme Court · 1954

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Eden Ex Rel. Eden v. KlaasNebraska Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Little Blue Natural Resources District v. Lower Platte North Natural Resources DistrictNebraska Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Camerlinck v. ThomasNebraska Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Bazar v. Department of Motor VehiclesNebraska Court of Appeals · 2009
  5. Hanks v. BoothSupreme Court of Kansas · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API