Legal Opinion

Perez v. Progenics Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided July 24, 2013No. Case No. 10-CV-8278 (KMK)PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

KENNETH M. KARAS, District Judge.

Plaintiff Julio Perez, proceeding pro se, brings this action against Defendant Pro-genies Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (“Progenies”), alleging that Defendant violated the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (“Sarbanes-Oxley”), 18 U.S.C. § 1514A, by terminating Plaintiffs employment in retaliation for a memorandum he wrote regarding a press release about a pharmaceutical drug. Defendant now moves for summary judgment. For the reasons stated herein, Defendant’s Motion is denied.

I. Background

A. Factual Background

1. The Parties

The following facts are drawn from…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Ben Gary Triestman v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
  4. McCarthy v. Dun & Bradstreet Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
  5. Fincher v. Depository Trust and Clearing Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Ashmore v. CGI Group Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2015
  2. Yang v. Navigators Group, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2014
  3. Perez v. Progenics Pharmaceuticals, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2014
  4. Herrera v. Trabajamos Community Head Start, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2017
  5. Vaghela v. The Huntington National BankDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 2018

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API