Albion Consolidated Mining Co. v. Richmond Mining Co.
Nevada Supreme Court
Appeal from the District Court of the Sixth Judicial District, Eureka County. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court,
Hawley, J.:—
On the twenty-first day of October, 1873, E. H. Rose and others commenced an action in the district court of Eureka County against the Richmond Company (appellant herein), to determine the right of possession to certain mining ground. A trial of that case in 1881 in the district court resulted in a judgment for the Richmond Company, from which Rose took an appeal to this court. The real controversy in that action depended aipon the question of the validity of the Uncle Sam location, owned by Rose and others, and of the St. George and Victoria .locations, and patents…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Close v. SammSupreme Court of Iowa · 1869
- Richmond Mining Co. v. RoseSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Solen v. Virginia & Truckee RailroadNevada Supreme Court · 1878
- People v. CochranCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
- Rose v. Richmond Mining Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1882
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Pahlka v. Chicago, R. I. & P. R. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Pederson v. Seattle Consolidated Street Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1893
- State ex rel. Buford v. WatkinsSupreme Court of Florida · 1923
- Nevada Rock & Sand Co. v. GrichNevada Supreme Court · 1939
- Botsford v. Van RiperNevada Supreme Court · 1910
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.