Legal Opinion

Geigtech East Bay LLC v. Lutron Electronics Co., Inc.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided January 5, 2024No. 1:18-cv-05290Unknown

1Opinion

luspcsppy DOCUMENT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT | ELEC : SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK I. TRONICALLY FILED x He (Dare rep: 1/5/24 □□ GEIGTECH EAST BAY LLC, LS □ Plaintiff, 18 Civ, 05290 (CM) -against- 19 Civ, 04693 (CM) 20 Civ. 10195 (CM) LUTRON ELECTRONICS Co., INC, Defendant. DECISION ON MOTIONS IN LIMINE McMahon, J.: The court, for its rulings on the parties’ motions in limine: I. Lutron’s Motions in Limine Motion #1 (Dkt. # 310): Lutron moves in limine to exclude argument or evidence about the doctrine of equivalents — specifically, that the accused products satisfy any element of an…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Sri International v. Matsushita Electric Corporation of America and Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
  2. Tate Access Floors, Inc. And Tate Access Floors Leasing, Inc. v. Interface Architectural Resources, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
  3. In Re Echostar Communications CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
  4. Smithkline Beecham Corp. v. Apotex Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
  5. Liebel-Flarsheim Company and Mallinckrodt, Inc. v. Medrad, Inc., Defendant-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API