Legal Opinion

Committee to Save Cleveland's Huletts v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided March 30, 2001No. 1:99-cv-03046PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM & ORDER

O’MALLEY, District Judge.

Plaintiffs, the Committee to Save Cleveland’s Huletts, Edward J. Hauser, James H. Korecko, Jerry C. Mann, Stephen L. Merkel, and Rimantas Saikus (collectively the “Committee”), seek declaratory and injunctive relief against defendants, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Chief of Engineers Lt. General Joe N. Ballard and District Engineer Mark D. Feirstein, (comprising “the Corps”). Plaintiffs ask this Court for many different categories of relief, some of which are difficult to decipher and others of which this Court has no authority to grant. It…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,768 Phil A. Street and Clyde H. Street v. J.C. Bradford & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
  5. Marsh v. Oregon Natural Resources CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Neighborhood Ass'n of the Back Bay v. Federal Transit AdministrationDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2005
  2. CAMDEN COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATIONDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API