Legal Opinion

In re Colianni

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided September 15, 1977No. Patent Appeal No. 76-735PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RICH, Judge.

This appeal is from the decision of the Patent and Trademark Office Board of Appeals (board) affirming the rejection, under 35 USC § 112, first paragraph, of claims 1-6, which are all the claims present in appellant’s application serial No. 200,932, filed November 22, 1971, entitled “Bone Fusing Method.” The board’s unanimous decision was adhered to on reconsideration, one member dissenting. We affirm.

Appellant’s Disclosure

To place the issue on this appeal in perspective, appellant’s brief application, less formal portions, is reproduced in its entirety:

Abstract of the Disclosure

A…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Application of John Nicholson Gardner, Anthony Maitland Roe and George Lawrence WilleyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1970

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. In Re Jack R. Wands, Vincent R. Zurawski, Jr., and Hubert J.P. SchoemakerCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
  2. Ppg Industries, Inc. v. Guardian Industries CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
  3. In re SichertCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1977
  4. Emergency Fuel, LLC v. Penzoil-Quaker State Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
  5. Frizell Stephens v. Edward W. Murray, Attorney General of VirginiaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1990

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API