Kimberly Haller v. Champlain College
Supreme Court of Vermont
1DissentEaton, J.
¶ 51. The tuition benefit at issue in this case is not provided to claimant as part of her remuneration and should not be included in the calculation of claimant's average weekly wage. The majority's decision conflicts with the plain language of the Workers' Compensation Act and with controlling case law, and represents a vast judicial expansion of the definition of wages. For these reasons, I dissent.
¶ 52. An injured worker's disability benefit is based on the worker's average weekly wages. 21 V.S.A. § 650. Wages are defined by the Act to include "bonuses and the market value of board,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Morrison-Knudsen Construction Co. v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation ProgramsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Morin v. Essex Optical/The HartfordSupreme Court of Vermont · 2005
- Lydy v. Trustaff, Inc./Wausau Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Vermont · 2013
- Clodgo v. Rentavision, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1997
- Vermont Baptist Convention v. Burlington Zoning BoardSupreme Court of Vermont · 1992
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.