Boston Ins. v. City of New York
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Per curiam
This appeal turns upon whether the libellant proved those allegations of its libel which were in issue. The first of these was its incorporation which the answer denied and which the libellant did not attempt to prove. Although the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c, have not yet been extended to admiralty and we cannot therefore invoke Rule 9(a), the practice in admiralty is concededly extremely plastic and always has been so (E. I. Dupont de Nemours & Co. v. Vance, 19 How. 162, 15 L.Ed. 584) and it is legitimate to treat it as not immune to some of the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- EJ DuPont De Nemours & Co. v. VanceSupreme Court of the United States · 1857
- American Transp. Co. v. Swift & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1928
3Cited by10 opinions
- Anibal Conte, Libelant-Appellee-Appellant v. Flota Mercante Del Estado, Respondent-Appellant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1960
- Deupree v. LevinsonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1950
- Untersinger v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1949
- Paragon Oil Co. v. Republic Tankers, S. A.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962
- Mercado v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1950
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.